- RE Riches
- Posts
- He Paid Full Price for a House in 1973. He Still Owns It π‘
He Paid Full Price for a House in 1973. He Still Owns It π‘
This is a sponsor Ad, it helps us to make this newsletter and bring more valuable stories to you.
Scale Your IRL Campaigns Like Digital Ads
Out Of Home advertising has long been effective but hard to scaleβuntil now. AdQuick makes it simple to plan, deploy, and measure campaigns with the same efficiency and insight you expect from online marketing tools.
Marketers agree: OOH is powerful for brand growth, driving new customers, and reinforcing messaging. AdQuick makes it easy, intuitive, and data-drivenβso you can treat real-world campaigns like any other digital channel.
πΈ He Paid Full Price for a House in 1973. He Still Owns It π‘
Hey RE Rockstar,
Last time we met a nineteen-year-old who bought a twelve-unit building with none of his own money and had 180 apartments by twenty-three.
Today is the other end of the telescope.
Today's subject bought one house in 1973. He paid retail β no discount, no clever structure, 20% down, like anybody else.
He still owns it.
In between: three recessions, four tax-law changes, and mortgage rates that have swung from 6% to 16%.
Meet John Schaub.
Worth knowing before you start: edition 07's subject, Chad Carson, has studied this man's newsletters and classes for eighteen years and hands his book to beginners. The "small and mighty" idea we covered back then came from here.
WHAT WILL YOU GET TODAY?
βοΈ See why getting a deal matters less than you think.
βοΈ Get the whole plan β it's ten houses, and that's it.
βοΈ Learn the one question he asks every prospective tenant.
βοΈ Hear the two mistakes he'll admit to, fifty years on.
[SPONSOR SLOT β place partner ad here]
INVESTOR SPOTLIGHT OF THE DAY
Meet John Schaub,
Who got his real estate licence in college in the 1960s,
And earned his first commission β $5,000 β
In his senior year, managing an apartment building.
Three years later, in 1973,
He bought his first rental house in Sarasota.
Not a foreclosure. Not a distressed seller.
Retail price. Twenty per cent down.
The most ordinary transaction imaginable.
HERE'S THE BREAKDOWN
That house is still in his portfolio today.
Not sold at the peak. Not 1031'd into something bigger.
Just owned, for more than fifty years,
Through three recessions, four tax-law changes,
And interest rates between 6% and 16%.
By the book's own account, that single ordinary house
Produced over $300,000 in equity across thirty years β
On top of the rent it paid the whole time.
Today he owns 25+ properties,
Managed by himself and one part-time assistant.
No fund. No investors. No syndication.
And when you ask him for the strategy,
It is almost insultingly simple:
Buy one. Rent it. Stop and learn. Repeat.

Graphic 1 β the arc
JOHN'S BLUEPRINT TO SUCCESS
Buy the house that will always be wanted. He doesn't shop every listing looking for the best price. He looks for a specific kind of house in a specific kind of neighbourhood β safe, near schools, sound construction, a decent lot, in a price band that attracts people who want to stay. The cheap house in the rough area always has the better spreadsheet on day one. It has a much worse decade. And note where he says the value actually sits: in the lot, not in what you do to the building.
The whole plan is ten houses. Not a hundred units, not a fund. Buy roughly one a year for ten years, then spend the following ten to twenty paying them off. His line: "if you buy 10 houses and get 'em paid for, in almost any market, you're gonna have as much money as anybody in your town." His own father ran a smaller version β three paid-off houses, producing about $3,000 a month in retirement. Work backwards from the income you want and the number is usually smaller than you feared.
One question, asked of every applicant: "How long do you wanna stay in the house?" That's it. His average tenancy runs about ten years, with some past twenty and thirty. And he's blunt about why it matters: a tenant who stays two years or more makes you money, and a one-year tenancy loses it. Most landlords screen for whether someone can pay. He screens for whether they intend to stay.

Graphic 2 β the mechanism
BACK TO JOHN'S STORY
Here's the part I'd want you to sit with.
He bought that first house at full price.
Fifty years of compounding did not care.
Which is an uncomfortable thing to read
If you've spent two years hunting for a bargain
And own nothing.
He's also unusually willing to name what he got wrong.
Mistake one: he used short-term seller financing early on β
Five-year notes β and calls it "not a good strategy."
Mistake two: he diversified.
Motels, restaurants, apartments.
All of it, by his account, less profitable
Than the boring single-family houses he understood.
And one structural idea worth more than it looks:
He'd rather have one house completely debt-free
Than the same debt spread evenly across several.
Same total borrowing. Very different worst case.

Graphic 3 β the payoff
LESSONS FROM A SELF-MADE MILLIONAIRE
LESSON #1: HOW LONG YOU HOLD BEATS HOW WELL YOU BUY
A retail purchase held fifty years beat
Every clever deal somebody flipped in 1974.
Buy something worth keeping. Then keep it.
LESSON #2: SCREEN FOR INTENT, NOT JUST INCOME
Two years of tenancy is the break-even line.
So ask the question that predicts it.
"How long do you want to stay?" costs nothing to ask.
LESSON #3: THE NUMBER IS SMALLER THAN YOU THINK
Ten houses. Possibly three, like his father.
Calculate the income you actually need
Before you accept somebody else's definition of scale.
LESSON #4: CONCENTRATION BEAT DIVERSIFICATION β FOR HIM
The motels and restaurants underperformed the houses.
He is not arguing that focus always wins.
He's arguing that he was worse at things he understood less,
Which is a quieter and more useful claim.
John Schaub has now invested through more market cycles than most readers have been alive for, and his entire method fits on a postcard: buy an ordinary house in a good neighbourhood, find someone who wants to stay, pay it off, do it about ten times. The unglamorous part isn't a bug in the strategy. It is the strategy.
How Did You Find Today's Edition? Your feedback is invaluable to us. Help us refine our content by letting us know how you felt about today's edition. |
|---|
π°π°π°π°π° Absolutely valuable! |
π°π°π° Informative, but there's more to uncover. |
π° Needs significant improvement. |
Login or Subscribe to participate in polls. |
Do his arithmetic on yourself, right now. It takes two minutes.
Take the monthly income you'd need to stop worrying. Divide it by the net monthly rent of an ordinary house in your area β rent minus taxes, insurance, maintenance and vacancy. Not the gross. The net.
That's your number. That's how many paid-off houses you need. All of it.
Is it ten? Is it four? Is it more than you expected, or a lot less?
Hit reply and tell me the number you got. I read every one.
To the long way round,
β RE Riches
The content of this newsletter is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Conduct your own research or consult a financial professional before making investment decisions.

